The Person Who Was Murdered By Lies and Lying under oath

The ABC Network had a trial last night on 20/20 about a man that was almost found guilty of a crime he did not commit. It was a story that could have occured to anyone anywhere. It was a compelling story about how justice goes wrong when one person decides to take one's fate into their own hands. It the case last night, March 5, 2010, it was a Medical Examiner that had lied for over thirty years to get people convicted. No telling how many guiltless people this man sent to prison or death.
I, too, have a story that parallels that story except this innocent person was killed by the Commonwealth of Virginia. And, it only took them five years to do it. This was a conspiracy of a lot of people, judge, prosecutor, police and defense lawyers. It seems implausible, maybe impossible to you but it occured and I have the substantiation it happened. It is undeniable proof since it came from the mouths of the people that carried out this horrible crime.
In Roanoke County Virginia in nineteen ninety-seven Earl Bramblett was put on trial for his life. It was a crime that took place in nineteen ninety-four. Four people were found dead, murdered, in a house that had been set on fire. The man, husband and father, Blain Hodges was discovered in bed upstairs in the house and he had been shot once in the head. His two daughters were found in another bedroom and both had been shot twice each in their heads. The wife and mother was discovered downstairs on a couch and she had been strangled and her body burned beyond recognition. The conflagration did little structural harm to the residence because all the windows and doors had been shut and the fire was smothered from lack of oxygen.
The case was tried in the county seat of Salem, Virginia and heard by Judge Roy Willett. The Commonwealth Attorney of Roanoke County was F.W. (Skip) Burkart and his assistant Randy Leach. Two defense attorneys, appointed by Willett, were Mac Doubles and Terry Grimes.
Let's start with the defense lawyers. These were two of the most inexperienced lawyers in the Roanoke Valley. Grimes was particularly ineffective and well-known for losing trials that should have been easily won. Doubles, on the other hand, didn't have enough experience to have a history yet. During the trial it was evident these two lawyers were intimidated by the seriousness of the case and were badly prepared. They had wasted a year, while Bramblett was in the county jail, allegedly planning for this trial. It was evident they were incompetent, unprepared and scared.
The Commonwealth Attorney Burkart had prepared for the trial and had his "facts" laid out for the trial. These proof were in truth all lies. The only thing that was a fact that he mentioned was the real crime and the victims. Everything else was made of whole cloth, lies, and easily proven so if Bramblett had had a sincere defense. He and Randy Leach had prepped a jail house snitch to perjure himself by saying he had made notes of something Bramblett shared with him while in jail. That, too, was a lie. Bramblett had not told him anything he swore to in court. Opening and closing were filled with lies had anyone been listening closely.
Roy Willett, the judge in the case, sat and oversaw this one sided miscarriage of justice and intimidated the inexperienced lawyers while giving Burkart all he brought up as proof. A video made supposed to show the jury how a white truck turned in a "pinkish" red truck under illumination Burkart knew was incorrect. Willett was supposed to see the trial was fair, but he made sure it wouldn't be from the beginning by appointing these incompetent lawyers to defend Bramblett. Then he sat and listened while it was mostly a trial from the prosecution side only. Not anything of substance was objected to.
The head investigator, State Police Investigator Barry Keesee, testified to conversations he had with Bramblett where no one but he heard. He lied by omission by failing to tell the court he had visited Bramblett's place of employment the morning of the crime, then testified he thought it was a murder/suicide till that afternoon. He couldn't talk about the visit because it would have destroyed the lie about the murder/suicide. His 'good ol' boy" attitude and down-home manner made the lies well-suited for the jury.
So, Bramblett was found guilty, something that shocked no one, and was given the death penalty. Then the same incompetent Grimes "argued" his case before the Supreme Court of Virginia and, as usual, was denied a new (real) trial. His habeas lawyer was Will Lindsey, whom most assumed to be an effective lawyer, however for some incentive, he joined the cabal and threw Bramblett to the wolves, using the same lies presented in the trial. Lindsey had all the new evidence but chose to sweep it under the rug. Bramblett was murdered in just over five years from his trial. This kind of fast track executions are reserved for the Oklahoma City bomber and the Washington, DC sniper.

Article Source: http://casinoarticles.us

allamosa.com allamosa.com/thenewnazis.html allamosa.com/absolutefacts.html

Please Rate this Article

5 out of 54 out of 53 out of 52 out of 51 out of 5 

Not yet Rated